¿qué demonios?
In Chapter 11 of A
Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari (D&G) discuss the
territorializaton and deterritorialization of assemblages and how their oppositional relationship creates the consistency and fluidity of assemblage.
“Just as milieus swing between a stratum state and a movement of destratification, assemblages swing between a territorial closure that tends to restratify them and a deterritorialzing movement that on the contrary connects them with the Cosmos. Thus it is not surprising that the distinction we were seeking was not between assemblages and something else but between the two limits of any possible assemblage, in other words, between the system or strata and the plane of consistency.” (p. 392)
My initial reaction to this passage, as with most of
D&G, was ¿qué demonios? So I
turned to Manuel De Landa’s book The New
Philosophy of Society, Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity for clarification. De Landa
uses assemblage theory to explain social ontology in a very clear and meaningful way. His summary of assemblage
theory gave me the sense of illumination or at least partial illumination coveted by people everywhere reading D&G.
“First of all, unlike wholes in which parts are linked by relations of interiority (that is, relations which constitute the very identity of the parts) assemblages are made up of parts which are self-subsistent and articulated by relations of exteriority, so that a part may be detached and made a component of another assemblage…….A second dimension characterizes processes in which these components are involved: processes which stabilize or destabilize the identity of the assemblage (territorialization and deterritorialization.) (p.18)

